The US says to Europe, "fine, we'll try it your way," and allows that if the contingent of Germany, France and Britain can make a deal with Iran to allow transparent inspections of their nuclear program, the US won't block Iran's entry into the WTO. Claiming there are "ambiguities" on some "main issues", Iran rejected the proposal as expected by anyone not blinded by starry-eyed utopian dreams. Again, the problem is that Iran is not interested in any offers proposed by the West because what they want is precisely what they are pursuing: to become a nation with nuclear weapons. And they don't need to reach the US with the nuclear missiles, all they need to do is be able to reach Saudi Arabia. And Israel. And the Strait of Hormuz. With that capability, they could blackmail their way into the WTO or any other organization they so desire.
With that capability they could destroy Israel with impunity.
Or so they believe.
The problem is that neither the US, nor Europe, will take the chance of a nuclear-capable Iran. It must be obvious to everyone that an Iran capable of controlling the oil flow of the Middle East for their own purposes threatens the economic interests of all nations developed and developing and that's the bottom line.
Iran is playing a dangerous game and their newest move has tipped their hand.
The nations negotiating with Iran are now willing to go to the UN to sanction Iran. And the US position is unchanged with regards to the possibility of a nuclear Iran even if their bargaining position has. And Secretary Rice has reiterated that position.
The problem with UN sanctions, of course, is that both China and Russia have veto power in the Security Council. To the extent that Iran believes they have either Russia or China on their side is the extent to which they may play this right up to the edge.
Certainly much of Iran's nuclear program is being supplied by Russia, so they have an interest in vetoing sanctions. Additionally, Russia has huge oil reserves of its own. Throwing in with Iran may have attractive long-term strategic benefits for Russia by being apart of the new oil cartel which interestingly could include Venezuela. So imagine a future where Iran, controlling all of the Middle Eastern oil, Russia, and Venezuela band together to set prices without those pesky "market forces" interfering with their plan.
Will China make a separate peace with the Cartel? Maybe, but what do they bring to the table since they are dependent on oil? The only card they can play is the threat of taking away by force some of Russia's oil fields.The assessment is that China's dramatic military buildup threatens Taiwan. Which, if I had designs on Russia's Siberian Oil fields that's precisely what I would want everyone to think.The only way China gets to be a player in a world where Iran is a nuclear power is if it has oil to sell or are energy independent. Both of these goals lead directly to Siberia.
The calculus of the oil situation is such that it becomes easy to see why it is neither the US nor Europe can afford to allow Iran to be a nuclear power. Global instability is generally thought of to be a bad thing. Especially when those with the upper hand are not prone to Democratic institutions and are in fact tend, to varying degrees, towards the autocratic and dictatorial
And there is little doubt in my mind, that the US is going to do whatever is necessary to assure it never happens.
The UN claims to be in possession of the secret Syrian withdrawal plan complete with specific timetable. Of course, the UN envoy is not discussing the details with anyone until next week. My guess? It will fall short, again, of what is being demanded. We have to keep in mind the goal of all of this; free and fair elections in May. That means no pressure from Syrian forces, Syrian intelligence agents, or from an armed Hizbollah. The much ballyhooed "withdrawal" of Syria from Lebanon is meaningless unless the above objectives are met, which is precisely what UN Security Council Resolution 1559 was intended to accomplish; Lebanese elections free from intimidation. And it is precisely why the disarmament of Hizbollah was part and parcel of the resolution.
In days gone by, such developments as we have seen would not give us much cause for hope. But things are different today. Not only has Iraq changed the Calculus of the political situation in the Middle East, but the players are different. Bashar Assad is not even a shadow of his father, Hafez in ruthlessness and political savy. A human rights activist based in Damascus, Ammar Abdulhamid, summarizes the situation in Syria using Godfather terms:
"It's a mafia. The capo
di tutti capi has died but Michael Corleone [the tough son in the
Godfather] is missing and Fredo [the weak son] is in charge."
And by doing so brings into focus not only the political situation in Syria, but the very nature of the reality of Ba'athism; it is plain and simple a criminal organization with its fingers in graft, arms and drug dealing in addition to the political objective of destroying Israel.
And the sooner it falls the better.
To commemorate the anniversary of the March 11th bombings in Madrid, Spain's leading Muslim organization issues a Fatwa against al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.
"We declare ... that Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda organization,
responsible for the horrendous crimes against innocent people who were
despicably murdered in the March 11 terrorist attack in Madrid, are
outside the parameters of Islam," the commission said.
The commission said the Koran barred Muslims from committing crimes against innocent people...
"The terrorist acts of Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda organization
... which result in the death of civilians, such as women and children
... are totally prohibited and are the object of strong condemnation
within Islam," it said in a statement citing extensively from religious
texts.
Amen to that.
Recent Comments